Testing of the bookmaking company Olimp
In this article we will briefly tell about the results of the inspection, one of the most popular Russian BC. Testing of the bookmaking company Olimp allowed to form the most objective opinion about the pros and cons of this platform for sports betting. The results of the work we share with our readers and viewers of the video version of this article.
Video about testing the bookmaking company Olimp
Create an account in BK Olympus
Create an account on the website of BK Olympus is fast enough and requires only the input e-mail address and phone number. On the other hand, it will not allow you to get a full account and immediately start betting.
For full registration on the website will need to have an account in the Second Cupie (QIWI payment system), as well as to pass the maximum identity, which is associated with a personal visit to one of the offices of the company, or its partners.
Also BK Olympus will be asked to upload copies of documents to their website and take a video test with Skype or other Internet communication.
Not the most comfortable procedure, but some of its requirements are dictated by legal status of the site and related requirements by state regulators.
Line in BC Olympus
If we talk about this bookie, it is clearly at a level that is slightly below average. Are available for bets on popular sports known leagues, competitions and events. On the other hand, exotics are almost there, and the very smellZia is possible to wager the largest.
The coefficients in Bq Olympus
The odds the bookie is also not affect its profitability. If we compare the figures with the competition, we can notice the following: in the popular event numbers are about the same as average for the market, but in the case of less well-known matches/fights, multipliers lower than that of the best representatives of rating bookmakers, Russian Federation.
The interface on the official website of the Olympus BK
If we evaluate a separate interface, then BK Olympus it deserves five. Done everything according to the unwritten standards, using a nice black-and-red-and-yellow color palette.
Line located on the left-hand side, a detailed painting of events – in the center of the screen, and the interface unit with the coupon in the right – hand side of the page.
In addition, for the convenience of users implemented the colored indicators that are shown in real time increase/decrease of the coefficients.
In General, use the website conveniently, and the interface does not cause problems associated with its relevance and modernity.
Mobile apps BK Olympus
In addition to standard bets through the Sportsbook site, the company realized the opportunity the mobile betting, which is seriously gaining popularity in recent years.
Betting via mobile phones and tablets , was created two applications. User feedback suggests that the program is not buggy, and is also suitable even for those devices that do not have the biggest screen size.
Input and output means with the site of Olympus BK
Depositing and withdrawing winnings is not a problem. Licensed venue status allows you to be fully assured that no deception or fraud will not occur.
For operations can be used credit cards, wallets the RAprostranih payment systems, sending money through mobile payments.
Support BC Olimp
Reviews about support not the most positive. The main negative is associated with the relative slowness of their work. Nevertheless, problems are resolved and not left "hanging in the air." To contact the operators of the bookmaker by mail or through a special chat in the bottom right corner of the official website.
Final conclusions about bookies
In General, the bookmaker is happy modern interface, legal status, availability of mobile applications and the lack of issues when the input and output of money. On the other hand, among the problems are: not the greatest odds, a small variation of the line, a long registration process and the slow support.
If you try to give a comprehensive assessment of all the pluses and minuses of the site, that you can put it about 3.8 out of a possible 5 points.